head to head · open source

Screenity vs nanobrowser

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars, 1,521 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. nanobrowser has 13,809 stars, 1,456 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Screenity leads on adoption by 35% (18,703 vs 13,809 stars). Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; nanobrowser is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Screenity has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, nanobrowser 11%. Screenity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chrome-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Screenity ★ 19K nanobrowser ★ 14K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Screenity nanobrowser
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 14K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-08-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Screenity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Screenity profile →

pick nanobrowser if

  • You want the nanobrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nanobrowser fits your workflow better

full nanobrowser profile →

About Screenity

Screenity is a JavaScript Chrome extension under the GPL 3.0 license that records the screen and supports annotation in the browser. It lives in the Chrome extension ecosystem and is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, while its source code is available on GitHub.

read the full Screenity overview →

About nanobrowser

Nanobrowser is an open source Chrome extension for AI powered web automation that runs multi agent workflows inside your own browser using your own LLM API key, built for people who want Operator style browser agents without a subscription.

read the full nanobrowser overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Screenity vs uBlock Screenity vs Ladybird Screenity vs chrome-devtools-mcp Screenity vs monaco-editor Screenity vs Zen Browser Screenity vs servo Screenity vs serenity Screenity vs refined-github Screenity vs slate Screenity vs Avalonia Screenity vs webtorrent Screenity vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is Screenity or nanobrowser more popular?

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars and nanobrowser has 13,809. Screenity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Screenity and nanobrowser free?

Both are open source. Screenity is licensed under GPL-3.0 and nanobrowser under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Screenity and nanobrowser?

Screenity is written in JavaScript and nanobrowser in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Screenity or nanobrowser?

Choose Screenity if you want the larger community (18,703 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose nanobrowser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.