head to head · open source

Screenity vs kysely

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars, 1,521 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. kysely has 14,233 stars, 444 forks, 173 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Screenity leads on adoption by 31% (18,703 vs 14,233 stars). Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; kysely is written in TypeScript under MIT. Screenity has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, kysely 3%. kysely was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Screenity ★ 19K kysely ★ 14K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Screenity kysely
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 14K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 444
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Screenity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Screenity profile →

pick kysely if

  • You want the kysely feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and kysely fits your workflow better

full kysely profile →

About Screenity

Screenity is a JavaScript Chrome extension under the GPL 3.0 license that records the screen and supports annotation in the browser. It lives in the Chrome extension ecosystem and is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, while its source code is available on GitHub.

read the full Screenity overview →

About kysely

Kysely is a type safe TypeScript SQL query builder for Node.js, Deno, Bun, and the browser. It provides a fluent API to construct and execute type safe SQL queries, preventing runtime errors from invalid column names or incorrect data types. The core problem it solves is eliminating the fragility of raw SQL strings and the lack of type safety in many ORMs within the TypeScript ecosystem.

read the full kysely overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Screenity vs uBlock Screenity vs Ladybird Screenity vs chrome-devtools-mcp Screenity vs monaco-editor Screenity vs Zen Browser Screenity vs servo Screenity vs serenity Screenity vs refined-github Screenity vs slate Screenity vs Avalonia Screenity vs webtorrent Screenity vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is Screenity or kysely more popular?

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars and kysely has 14,233. Screenity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Screenity and kysely free?

Both are open source. Screenity is licensed under GPL-3.0 and kysely under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Screenity and kysely?

Screenity is written in JavaScript and kysely in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Screenity or kysely?

Choose Screenity if you want the larger community (18,703 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose kysely if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.