head to head · open source

Screenity vs HackBrowserData

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars, 1,521 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. HackBrowserData has 14,534 stars, 1,810 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. Screenity leads on adoption by 29% (18,703 vs 14,534 stars). Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; HackBrowserData is written in Go under MIT. Screenity has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, HackBrowserData 12%. Screenity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Screenity ★ 19K HackBrowserData ★ 15K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Screenity HackBrowserData
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 15K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Screenity if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Screenity profile →

pick HackBrowserData if

  • You want the HackBrowserData feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and HackBrowserData fits your workflow better

full HackBrowserData profile →

About Screenity

Screenity is a JavaScript Chrome extension under the GPL 3.0 license that records the screen and supports annotation in the browser. It lives in the Chrome extension ecosystem and is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, while its source code is available on GitHub.

read the full Screenity overview →

About HackBrowserData

HackBrowserData is an MIT licensed command line tool written in Go that decrypts and exports browser data — passwords, cookies, history, bookmarks, credit cards, downloads, extensions, localStorage and sessionStorage — from Chromium based browsers, Firefox, and Safari for security research on Windows, macOS and Linux.

read the full HackBrowserData overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Screenity vs uBlock Screenity vs Ladybird Screenity vs chrome-devtools-mcp Screenity vs monaco-editor Screenity vs Zen Browser Screenity vs servo Screenity vs serenity Screenity vs refined-github Screenity vs slate Screenity vs Avalonia Screenity vs webtorrent Screenity vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is Screenity or HackBrowserData more popular?

Screenity has 18,703 GitHub stars and HackBrowserData has 14,534. Screenity has the larger community by that measure.

Are Screenity and HackBrowserData free?

Both are open source. Screenity is licensed under GPL-3.0 and HackBrowserData under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Screenity and HackBrowserData?

Screenity is written in JavaScript and HackBrowserData in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Screenity or HackBrowserData?

Choose Screenity if you want the larger community (18,703 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose HackBrowserData if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.