head to head · open source

Scrapling vs katana

Scrapling has 81,798 GitHub stars, 8,307 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. katana has 17,518 stars, 1,183 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 367% (81,798 vs 17,518 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; katana is written in Go under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, katana 7%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 82K katana ★ 18K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling katana
GitHub stars ★ 82K ★ 18K
License BSD-3-Clause MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick katana if

  • You want the katana feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and katana fits your workflow better

full katana profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K ClickHouse ★ 50K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs scrapy scrapling vs easyspider scrapling vs changedetection-io scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs crawlee Scrapling vs colly Scrapling vs stagehand Scrapling vs proxy_pool Scrapling vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or katana more popular?

Scrapling has 81,798 GitHub stars and katana has 17,518. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and katana free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and katana under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and katana?

Scrapling is written in Python and katana in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or katana?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (81,798 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose katana if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.