head to head · open source
Browser Use vs Scrapling
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars, 13,371 forks, 421 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Scrapling has 95,157 stars, 9,976 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Browser Use leads on adoption by 26% (119,977 vs 95,157 stars). Browser Use is written in Python under MIT; Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. Browser Use has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Scrapling 10%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (mcp, playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Browser Use | Scrapling | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 120K | ★ 95K |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 13K | ⑂ 10.0K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Browser Use if
- You weight community size — 120K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Scrapling if
- You want the Scrapling feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Scrapling fits your workflow better
About Browser Use
Navigate the web like a human does. Find an available slot, pick a date and time, handle the CAPTCHA, and book a driving test. Explore more demos and prompts ↗ Which Browser Use do I need? Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud: Scale up with a fully hosted agent and browser. Path 2: CLI: Automate your own browser tasks. Path 3: Python Library: Run the open source Browser Use agent locally from your own code. Quickstart Path 1: Fully Hosted Cloud Scale browser automation with our hosted agent, stealth browsers, and infrastructure for profiles, recordings, and data policies. Get started with the API ↗ New Google, GitHub, or…
read the full Browser Use overview →
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Browser Use or Scrapling more popular?
Browser Use has 119,977 GitHub stars and Scrapling has 95,157. Browser Use has the larger community by that measure.
Are Browser Use and Scrapling free?
Both are open source. Browser Use is licensed under MIT and Scrapling under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Browser Use and Scrapling?
Browser Use is written in Python and Scrapling in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Browser Use or Scrapling?
Choose Browser Use if you want the larger community (119,977 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Scrapling if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.