head to head · open source
Scrapling vs CloakBrowser
Scrapling has 91,885 GitHub stars, 9,681 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloakBrowser has 32,683 stars, 2,718 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 181% (91,885 vs 32,683 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, CloakBrowser 8%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (playwright), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | CloakBrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 92K | ★ 33K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.7K | ⑂ 2.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CloakBrowser if
- You want the CloakBrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and CloakBrowser fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or CloakBrowser more popular?
Scrapling has 91,885 GitHub stars and CloakBrowser has 32,683. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and CloakBrowser free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and CloakBrowser under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and CloakBrowser?
Scrapling is written in Python and CloakBrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or CloakBrowser?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (91,885 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose CloakBrowser if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.