head to head · open source
Scrapling vs crw
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars, 9,759 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. crw has 1,208 stars, 97 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 7,568% (92,628 vs 1,208 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; crw is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Scrapling has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, crw 8%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (ai, crawler, data-extraction, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Scrapling | crw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 93K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.8K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Scrapling if
- You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick crw if
- You want the crw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and crw fits your workflow better
About Scrapling
Effortless Web Scraping for the Modern Web Selection methods · Fetchers · Spiders · Proxy Rotation · CLI · MCP Scrapling is an adaptive Web Scraping framework that handles everything from a single request to a full scale crawl. Its parser learns from website changes and automatically relocates your elements when pages update. Its fetchers bypass anti bot systems like Cloudflare Turnstile out of the box. And its spider framework lets you scale up to concurrent, multi session crawls with pause/resume, automatic proxy rotation, and a crawl speed that adapts to how fast each…
read the full Scrapling overview →
About crw
fastCRW Turn URLs into clean markdown or structured JSON with one engine for search, scrape, map, crawl, and extract. Run it locally as a small Rust binary or use the managed API. Get 1000 free credits → · Install · Docs No credit card. Continue with GitHub. One command install Runs local and free, no account needed. To use the Cloud, paste your key into the same command and it installs the binary, connects the key, and registers the MCP server with the AI coding tools you already have: Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini CLI, OpenCode and Windsurf are picked up automatically when they are already set up; nothing…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Scrapling or crw more popular?
Scrapling has 92,628 GitHub stars and crw has 1,208. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.
Are Scrapling and crw free?
Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and crw under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Scrapling and crw?
Scrapling is written in Python and crw in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Scrapling or crw?
Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose crw if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.