head to head · open source

Scrapling vs ArrowDL

Scrapling has 81,917 GitHub stars, 8,326 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ArrowDL has 851 stars, 41 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Scrapling leads on adoption by 9,526% (81,917 vs 851 stars). Scrapling is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; ArrowDL is written in C++ under LGPL-3.0. Scrapling has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ArrowDL 5%. Scrapling was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapling ★ 82K ArrowDL ★ 851 category Data & Analytics

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapling ArrowDL
GitHub stars ★ 82K ★ 851
License BSD-3-Clause LGPL-3.0
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-04
Forks ⑂ 8.3K ⑂ 41
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapling if

  • You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapling profile →

pick ArrowDL if

  • You want the ArrowDL feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and ArrowDL fits your workflow better

full ArrowDL profile →

About Scrapling

Scrapling is an adaptive Python web scraping framework for developers, data teams, and regular users who need anything from a single request to a full scale crawl without rewriting selectors every time a site changes.

read the full Scrapling overview →

About ArrowDL

ArrowDL (Arrow Downloader) is a free, open source, standalone download manager for Windows, macOS and Linux, built in C++ with the Qt framework and aimed at anyone who needs to capture, queue and batch download files, media streams and torrents without depending on a browser's built in downloader.

read the full ArrowDL overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K ClickHouse ★ 50K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling scrapling vs scrapy scrapling vs easyspider scrapling vs clickhouse scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Scrapling vs Crawl4AI Scrapling vs scrapy Scrapling vs EasySpider Scrapling vs changedetection.io Scrapling vs lux Scrapling vs CloakBrowser Scrapling vs Scrapegraph-ai Scrapling vs crawlee Scrapling vs colly Scrapling vs stagehand Scrapling vs proxy_pool Scrapling vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapling or ArrowDL more popular?

Scrapling has 81,917 GitHub stars and ArrowDL has 851. Scrapling has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapling and ArrowDL free?

Both are open source. Scrapling is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and ArrowDL under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapling and ArrowDL?

Scrapling is written in Python and ArrowDL in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapling or ArrowDL?

Choose Scrapling if you want the larger community (81,917 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose ArrowDL if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.