head to head · open source

SafeLine vs litestar

SafeLine has 22,606 GitHub stars, 1,533 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. litestar has 8,467 stars, 646 forks, 343 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SafeLine leads on adoption by 167% (22,606 vs 8,467 stars). SafeLine is written in Go under GPL-3.0; litestar is written in Python under MIT. SafeLine has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, litestar 8%. litestar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

SafeLine ★ 23K litestar ★ 8.5K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

SafeLine litestar
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 8.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 646
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick SafeLine if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full SafeLine profile →

pick litestar if

  • You want the litestar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and litestar fits your workflow better

full litestar profile →

About SafeLine

SafeLine is a self hosted web application firewall and reverse proxy, written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, that filters, monitors, and blocks malicious HTTP/S traffic before it reaches a web application — built for developers, AppSec engineers, and blue teams who want to run edge protection on their own infrastructure.

read the full SafeLine overview →

About litestar

Litestar is an open source ASGI framework for Python, distributed under the MIT license and hosted in the litestar org GitHub organization. It describes itself as light, flexible and extensible, and it is built to scale. The project has been in development for five years, has accumulated 8,462 stars and 642 forks, and its most recent push was on 11 September 2026. Documentation lives at docs.litestar.dev, and the project publishes releases through PyPI.

read the full litestar overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

SafeLine vs fastapi SafeLine vs Hoppscotch SafeLine vs Bruno SafeLine vs Insomnia SafeLine vs one-api SafeLine vs OpenAPI-Specification SafeLine vs openapi-generator SafeLine vs redoc SafeLine vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF SafeLine vs grpc-gateway SafeLine vs Yaak SafeLine vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is SafeLine or litestar more popular?

SafeLine has 22,606 GitHub stars and litestar has 8,467. SafeLine has the larger community by that measure.

Are SafeLine and litestar free?

Both are open source. SafeLine is licensed under GPL-3.0 and litestar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between SafeLine and litestar?

SafeLine is written in Go and litestar in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, SafeLine or litestar?

Choose SafeLine if you want the larger community (22,606 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose litestar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.