head to head · open source
SafeLine vs cli-printing-press
SafeLine has 23,166 GitHub stars, 1,594 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. cli-printing-press has 4,909 stars, 534 forks, 65 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SafeLine leads on adoption by 372% (23,166 vs 4,909 stars). SafeLine is written in Go under GPL-3.0; cli-printing-press is written in Go under MIT. SafeLine has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, cli-printing-press 11%. cli-printing-press was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SafeLine | cli-printing-press | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 534 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SafeLine if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cli-printing-press if
- You want the cli-printing-press feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and cli-printing-press fits your workflow better
About SafeLine
SafeLine Make your web apps secure 🏠 Website 📖 Docs 🔍 Live Demo 🙋♂️ Discord 中文版 🏆 Achievements 👋 INTRODUCTION SafeLine is a self hosted WAF(Web Application Firewall) to protect your web apps from attacks and exploits. A web application firewall helps protect web apps by filtering and monitoring HTTP traffic between a web application and the Internet. It typically protects web apps from attacks such as SQL injection , XSS , code injection , os command injection , CRLF injection , ldap injection , xpath injection , RCE , XXE , SSRF , path traversal , backdoor , bruteforce , http flood , bot abused , among…
read the full SafeLine overview →
About cli-printing-press
CLI Printing Press Nothing is more valuable than time and money. In a world of AI agents, that's speed and token spend. A well designed CLI is muscle memory for an agent: no hunting through docs, no wrong turns, no wasted tokens. We built the Printing Press to print the best CLIs in the world for agents. It reads the official API docs, studies every popular community CLI and MCP server, sniffs the web for the APIs nobody published (think Google Flights or Dominos), and applies the power user playbook Peter Steinberger proved with discrawl and gogcli local SQLite, compound commands, agent native flags. It fuses…
read the full cli-printing-press overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SafeLine or cli-printing-press more popular?
SafeLine has 23,166 GitHub stars and cli-printing-press has 4,909. SafeLine has the larger community by that measure.
Are SafeLine and cli-printing-press free?
Both are open source. SafeLine is licensed under GPL-3.0 and cli-printing-press under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between SafeLine and cli-printing-press?
SafeLine is written in Go and cli-printing-press in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SafeLine or cli-printing-press?
Choose SafeLine if you want the larger community (23,166 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cli-printing-press if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.