head to head · open source

Yaak vs RWKV-Runner

Yaak has 19,243 GitHub stars, 817 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. RWKV-Runner has 6,482 stars, 601 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. Yaak leads on adoption by 197% (19,243 vs 6,482 stars). Yaak is written in TypeScript under MIT; RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT. Yaak has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, RWKV-Runner 9%. Yaak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Yaak ★ 19K RWKV-Runner ★ 6.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Yaak RWKV-Runner
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 6.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 817 ⑂ 601
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Yaak if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Yaak profile →

pick RWKV-Runner if

  • You want the RWKV-Runner feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and RWKV-Runner fits your workflow better

full RWKV-Runner profile →

About Yaak

Yaak is a desktop API client for REST, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, and Server Sent Events. It is built with Tauri, Rust, and React, and it lives in the developer tools ecosystem for API development and testing. The project presents itself as an offline first, privacy first alternative to Postman, Insomnia, and Bruno.

read the full Yaak overview →

About RWKV-Runner

RWKV Runner is a management and startup tool for RWKV, an open source large language model that is available for commercial use. It ships as a lightweight executable of only a few megabytes and automates the work of getting a model running, so that the user does not have to assemble the runtime, dependencies, and serving stack by hand. The project is written in TypeScript and built with Wails, and it is distributed under the MIT license from the josStorer repository. It lives in the RWKV ecosystem and in the broader local inference tooling space, with a companion site at rwkv.com.

read the full RWKV-Runner overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Yaak vs fastapi Yaak vs Hoppscotch Yaak vs Bruno Yaak vs Insomnia Yaak vs one-api Yaak vs OpenAPI-Specification Yaak vs openapi-generator Yaak vs redoc Yaak vs SafeLine Yaak vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF Yaak vs grpc-gateway Yaak vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is Yaak or RWKV-Runner more popular?

Yaak has 19,243 GitHub stars and RWKV-Runner has 6,482. Yaak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Yaak and RWKV-Runner free?

Both are open source. Yaak is licensed under MIT and RWKV-Runner under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Yaak and RWKV-Runner?

Yaak is written in TypeScript and RWKV-Runner in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Yaak or RWKV-Runner?

Choose Yaak if you want the larger community (19,243 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose RWKV-Runner if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.