head to head · open source

RWKV-Runner vs kiro-gateway

RWKV-Runner has 6,482 GitHub stars, 601 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. kiro-gateway has 2,281 stars, 551 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. RWKV-Runner leads on adoption by 184% (6,482 vs 2,281 stars). RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT; kiro-gateway is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. RWKV-Runner has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, kiro-gateway 24%. RWKV-Runner was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

RWKV-Runner ★ 6.5K kiro-gateway ★ 2.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

RWKV-Runner kiro-gateway
GitHub stars ★ 6.5K ★ 2.3K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-04 2026-05-18
Forks ⑂ 601 ⑂ 551
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick RWKV-Runner if

  • You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full RWKV-Runner profile →

pick kiro-gateway if

  • You want the kiro-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and kiro-gateway fits your workflow better

full kiro-gateway profile →

About RWKV-Runner

RWKV Runner is a management and startup tool for RWKV, an open source large language model that is available for commercial use. It ships as a lightweight executable of only a few megabytes and automates the work of getting a model running, so that the user does not have to assemble the runtime, dependencies, and serving stack by hand. The project is written in TypeScript and built with Wails, and it is distributed under the MIT license from the josStorer repository. It lives in the RWKV ecosystem and in the broader local inference tooling space, with a companion site at rwkv.com.

read the full RWKV-Runner overview →

About kiro-gateway

Kiro Gateway is an open source proxy API gateway that turns the Claude and other models available inside Kiro IDE and Kiro CLI (Amazon Q Developer / AWS CodeWhisperer) into OpenAI and Anthropic compatible API endpoints, for developers who want to reach those models from any client.

read the full kiro-gateway overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

RWKV-Runner vs fastapi RWKV-Runner vs Hoppscotch RWKV-Runner vs Bruno RWKV-Runner vs Insomnia RWKV-Runner vs one-api RWKV-Runner vs OpenAPI-Specification RWKV-Runner vs openapi-generator RWKV-Runner vs redoc RWKV-Runner vs SafeLine RWKV-Runner vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF RWKV-Runner vs grpc-gateway RWKV-Runner vs Yaak

Frequently asked questions

Is RWKV-Runner or kiro-gateway more popular?

RWKV-Runner has 6,482 GitHub stars and kiro-gateway has 2,281. RWKV-Runner has the larger community by that measure.

Are RWKV-Runner and kiro-gateway free?

Both are open source. RWKV-Runner is licensed under MIT and kiro-gateway under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between RWKV-Runner and kiro-gateway?

RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript and kiro-gateway in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, RWKV-Runner or kiro-gateway?

Choose RWKV-Runner if you want the larger community (6,482 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kiro-gateway if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.