head to head · open source
RWKV-Runner vs kiro-gateway
RWKV-Runner has 6,500 GitHub stars, 594 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. kiro-gateway has 2,350 stars, 562 forks, 103 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. RWKV-Runner leads on adoption by 177% (6,500 vs 2,350 stars). RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT; kiro-gateway is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. RWKV-Runner has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, kiro-gateway 24%. RWKV-Runner was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| RWKV-Runner | kiro-gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.5K | ★ 2.4K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 594 | ⑂ 562 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick RWKV-Runner if
- You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kiro-gateway if
- You want the kiro-gateway feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and kiro-gateway fits your workflow better
About RWKV-Runner
RWKV Runner This project aims to eliminate the barriers of using large language models by automating everything for you. All you need is a lightweight executable program of just a few megabytes. Additionally, this project provides an interface compatible with the OpenAI API, which means that every ChatGPT client is an RWKV client. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [![py version][py version image]][py version url] English 简体中文 日本語 Install [![Windows][Windows image]][Windows url] [![MacOS][MacOS image]][MacOS url] [![Linux][Linux image]][Linux url] FAQs Preview…
read the full RWKV-Runner overview →
About kiro-gateway
👻 Kiro Gateway Proxy gateway for Kiro API (Amazon Q Developer / AWS CodeWhisperer) 🇬🇧 English • 🇷🇺 Русский • 🇨🇳 中文 • 🇪🇸 Español • 🇮🇩 Indonesia • 🇧🇷 Português • 🇯🇵 日本語 • 🇰🇷 한국어 Made with ❤️ by @Jwadow Use Claude models from Kiro with Claude Code, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Claw Code, Codex app, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, Kilo Code, Obsidian, OpenAI SDK, LangChain, Continue and other OpenAI or Anthropic compatible tools Models • Features • Quick Start • Configuration • 💖 Sponsor 🤖 Available Models (Free List) ⚠️ Important: Model availability depends on your Kiro tier (free/paid). The gateway provides…
read the full kiro-gateway overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is RWKV-Runner or kiro-gateway more popular?
RWKV-Runner has 6,500 GitHub stars and kiro-gateway has 2,350. RWKV-Runner has the larger community by that measure.
Are RWKV-Runner and kiro-gateway free?
Both are open source. RWKV-Runner is licensed under MIT and kiro-gateway under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between RWKV-Runner and kiro-gateway?
RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript and kiro-gateway in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, RWKV-Runner or kiro-gateway?
Choose RWKV-Runner if you want the larger community (6,500 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kiro-gateway if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.