head to head · open source
RWKV-Runner vs aimock
RWKV-Runner has 6,500 GitHub stars, 594 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. aimock has 1,003 stars, 82 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. RWKV-Runner leads on adoption by 548% (6,500 vs 1,003 stars). RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT; aimock is written in TypeScript under MIT. RWKV-Runner has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, aimock 8%. aimock was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| RWKV-Runner | aimock | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.5K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 594 | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick RWKV-Runner if
- You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick aimock if
- You want the aimock feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and aimock fits your workflow better
About RWKV-Runner
RWKV Runner This project aims to eliminate the barriers of using large language models by automating everything for you. All you need is a lightweight executable program of just a few megabytes. Additionally, this project provides an interface compatible with the OpenAI API, which means that every ChatGPT client is an RWKV client. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [![py version][py version image]][py version url] English 简体中文 日本語 Install [![Windows][Windows image]][Windows url] [![MacOS][MacOS image]][MacOS url] [![Linux][Linux image]][Linux url] FAQs Preview…
read the full RWKV-Runner overview →
About aimock
aimock Mock infrastructure for AI application testing — point your SDK at one local port and every provider, protocol, and service answers deterministically. Quick start · The suite · Record & replay · Docs One package, one port, zero dependencies. LLM APIs, image generation and editing, text to speech, transcription, audio translation and generation, video generation, embeddings, MCP tools, A2A agents, AG UI event streams, vector databases, search, rerank, and moderation — no keys, no network, no surprise bills. Quick Start The aimock Suite aimock mocks everything your AI app talks to: Run them all on one port…
read the full aimock overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is RWKV-Runner or aimock more popular?
RWKV-Runner has 6,500 GitHub stars and aimock has 1,003. RWKV-Runner has the larger community by that measure.
Are RWKV-Runner and aimock free?
Both are open source. RWKV-Runner is licensed under MIT and aimock under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between RWKV-Runner and aimock?
RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript and aimock in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, RWKV-Runner or aimock?
Choose RWKV-Runner if you want the larger community (6,500 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose aimock if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.