head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs wireflow

Rocket.Chat has 46,231 GitHub stars, 13,956 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wireflow has 4,166 stars, 395 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 1,010% (46,231 vs 4,166 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; wireflow is written in JavaScript under MIT. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, wireflow 9%. wireflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (collaboration, hacktoberfest, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K wireflow ★ 4.2K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat wireflow
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 4.2K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 395
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick wireflow if

  • You want the wireflow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and wireflow fits your workflow better

full wireflow profile →

About Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About wireflow

Wireflow is a free, open source, browser only diagramming tool for sketching user flows, aimed at designers, developers and product teams who want to map interface journeys without an account or a backend.

read the full wireflow overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 61K Twenty ★ 58K Odoo ★ 55K marketingskills ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K cobalt ★ 45K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat rocket-chat vs cobalt rocket-chat vs mike plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Rocket.Chat vs Plane Rocket.Chat vs cobalt Rocket.Chat vs Buzz Rocket.Chat vs Jitsi Rocket.Chat vs srs Rocket.Chat vs Huly Rocket.Chat vs Zulip Rocket.Chat vs univer Rocket.Chat vs etherpad Rocket.Chat vs drawnix Rocket.Chat vs chat Rocket.Chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or wireflow more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,231 GitHub stars and wireflow has 4,166. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and wireflow free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and wireflow is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and wireflow?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and wireflow in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or wireflow?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,231 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose wireflow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.