head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs Huly

Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars, 13,891 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Huly has 27,700 stars, 2,155 forks, 849 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 67% (46,133 vs 27,700 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Huly is written in TypeScript under EPL-2.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Huly 8%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K Huly ★ 28K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat Huly
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 28K
License Custom / other EPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick Huly if

  • You want the Huly feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the EPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Huly fits your workflow better

full Huly profile →

About Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About Huly

Huly is an open source, EPL 2.0 licensed, TypeScript built all in one work platform that folds project management, issue tracking, chat, CRM, HRM and applicant tracking into one system teams can run on their own servers, aimed at organisations that want the ground Jira, Linear, ClickUp, Slack and Notion cover without renting it from five separate vendors.

read the full Huly overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs huly rocket-chat vs mike plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor plane vs hrms plane vs ever-gauzy twenty vs hrms twenty vs ever-gauzy odoo vs hrms odoo vs ever-gauzy plane vs horilla

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Rocket.Chat vs Plane Rocket.Chat vs cobalt Rocket.Chat vs Buzz Rocket.Chat vs Jitsi Rocket.Chat vs srs Rocket.Chat vs Zulip Rocket.Chat vs etherpad Rocket.Chat vs drawnix Rocket.Chat vs univer Rocket.Chat vs chat Rocket.Chat vs bigbluebutton Rocket.Chat vs hedgedoc

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or Huly more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars and Huly has 27,700. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and Huly free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Huly?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and Huly in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or Huly?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,133 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Huly if its feature set, stack or EPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.