head to head · open source
Rocket.Chat vs mirotalk
Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars, 13,891 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mirotalk has 4,739 stars, 773 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 873% (46,133 vs 4,739 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; mirotalk is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, mirotalk 16%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (collaboration, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Rocket.Chat | mirotalk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 4.7K |
| License | Custom / other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 773 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Rocket.Chat if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mirotalk if
- You want the mirotalk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and mirotalk fits your workflow better
About Rocket.Chat
Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.
read the full Rocket.Chat overview →
About mirotalk
MiroTalk P2P is a free, open source, self hosted video conferencing platform that connects participants through direct peer to peer WebRTC links, aimed at teams and organisations that want browser based meeting rooms running on their own infrastructure.
read the full mirotalk overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Rocket.Chat or mirotalk more popular?
Rocket.Chat has 46,133 GitHub stars and mirotalk has 4,739. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are Rocket.Chat and mirotalk free?
Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and mirotalk is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and mirotalk?
Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and mirotalk in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or mirotalk?
Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,133 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mirotalk if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.