head to head · open source
Rocket.Chat vs Kittysploit-framework
Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars, 14,076 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kittysploit-framework has 631 stars, 100 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 7,247% (46,361 vs 631 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Kittysploit-framework is written in Python under MIT. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Kittysploit-framework 16%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (collaboration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Rocket.Chat | Kittysploit-framework | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 46K | ★ 631 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 14K | ⑂ 100 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Rocket.Chat if
- You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Kittysploit-framework if
- You want the Kittysploit-framework feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Kittysploit-framework fits your workflow better
About Rocket.Chat
The ultimate secure open source solution for team communications Rocket.Chat is an open source, secure, fully customizable communications platform developed in TypeScript for organizations with high standards of data protection. We are the ultimate solution for team communications, enabling real time conversations between colleagues, with other companies, and with your customers or citizens, regardless of how they connect with you. The result is an increase in productivity and user satisfaction rates. Every day, tens of millions of users in over 150 countries and in organizations such as Deutsche Bahn, The US…
read the full Rocket.Chat overview →
About Kittysploit-framework
KittySploit From recon to shell — in one console. Autonomous agent for web/API testing. 8,000+ modules. Built in C2. Local LLM. Scope aware. Automation ready. Quick start · Docs · Website · Discord Why KittySploit? Most stacks force you to jump between a scanner, an exploit framework, a C2, a proxy, and a notebook. KittySploit keeps the engagement in one place — modules, sessions, scope, and an autonomous agent that plans and executes against authorized targets. Quick Start Linux and macOS One line installer: Windows First 60 seconds Use plan only / dry run until you are ready for live actions. Always test…
read the full Kittysploit-framework overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Rocket.Chat or Kittysploit-framework more popular?
Rocket.Chat has 46,361 GitHub stars and Kittysploit-framework has 631. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.
Are Rocket.Chat and Kittysploit-framework free?
Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and Kittysploit-framework is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Kittysploit-framework?
Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and Kittysploit-framework in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or Kittysploit-framework?
Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,361 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Kittysploit-framework if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.