head to head · open source

Rocket.Chat vs Element

Rocket.Chat has 46,136 GitHub stars, 13,893 forks, 4,023 open issues and last shipped today. Element has 13,461 stars, 2,759 forks, 3,779 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rocket.Chat leads on adoption by 243% (46,136 vs 13,461 stars). Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Element is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Rocket.Chat has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, Element 20%. Rocket.Chat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Rocket.Chat ★ 46K Element ★ 13K category Business Software

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Rocket.Chat Element
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 13K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Rocket.Chat if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Rocket.Chat profile →

pick Element if

  • You want the Element feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Element fits your workflow better

full Element profile →

About Rocket.Chat

Rocket.Chat is an open source, self hostable team communications platform written in TypeScript that gives organisations full ownership of their messaging, voice, and federation infrastructure instead of renting it from a closed SaaS vendor.

read the full Rocket.Chat overview →

About Element

Element is a Matrix collaboration client for the web and desktop, and its tagline describes it as secure, decentralized messaging for teams and individuals. It is built with the Matrix JS SDK and lives in the Matrix ecosystem as an open alternative to Slack and Google Meet.

read the full Element overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

plane vs rocket-chat rocket-chat vs cobalt rocket-chat vs mike plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato

More Collaboration & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.

Rocket.Chat vs Plane Rocket.Chat vs cobalt Rocket.Chat vs Buzz Rocket.Chat vs Jitsi Rocket.Chat vs srs Rocket.Chat vs Huly Rocket.Chat vs Zulip Rocket.Chat vs etherpad Rocket.Chat vs drawnix Rocket.Chat vs univer Rocket.Chat vs chat Rocket.Chat vs bigbluebutton

Frequently asked questions

Is Rocket.Chat or Element more popular?

Rocket.Chat has 46,136 GitHub stars and Element has 13,461. Rocket.Chat has the larger community by that measure.

Are Rocket.Chat and Element free?

Both are open source. Rocket.Chat has no licence declared in this registry, and Element is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Element?

Rocket.Chat is written in TypeScript and Element in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Rocket.Chat or Element?

Choose Rocket.Chat if you want the larger community (46,136 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Element if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.