head to head · open source

refined-github vs qutebrowser

refined-github has 32,187 GitHub stars, 1,914 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped yesterday. qutebrowser has 11,699 stars, 1,130 forks, 1,335 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. refined-github leads on adoption by 175% (32,187 vs 11,699 stars). refined-github is written in TypeScript under MIT; qutebrowser is written in Python under GPL-3.0. refined-github has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, qutebrowser 10%. refined-github was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

refined-github ★ 32K qutebrowser ★ 12K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

refined-github qutebrowser
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 12K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick refined-github if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full refined-github profile →

pick qutebrowser if

  • You want the qutebrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and qutebrowser fits your workflow better

full qutebrowser profile →

About refined-github

Refined GitHub is an MIT licensed browser extension written in TypeScript that simplifies the GitHub interface and adds useful features, built for developers and teams who spend their working day inside GitHub and want the small missing conveniences fixed without waiting for the platform itself to change.

read the full refined-github overview →

About qutebrowser

qutebrowser is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed, keyboard driven browser with a minimal GUI, built on Python and Qt, for people who want vim style keyboard control of the web rather than a mouse.

read the full qutebrowser overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

vscode vs monaco-editor browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp playwright vs chrome-devtools-mcp puppeteer vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs ladybird playwright vs obscura ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

refined-github vs uBlock refined-github vs Ladybird refined-github vs chrome-devtools-mcp refined-github vs monaco-editor refined-github vs Zen Browser refined-github vs servo refined-github vs serenity refined-github vs slate refined-github vs Avalonia refined-github vs webtorrent refined-github vs fingerprintjs refined-github vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is refined-github or qutebrowser more popular?

refined-github has 32,187 GitHub stars and qutebrowser has 11,699. refined-github has the larger community by that measure.

Are refined-github and qutebrowser free?

Both are open source. refined-github is licensed under MIT and qutebrowser under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between refined-github and qutebrowser?

refined-github is written in TypeScript and qutebrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, refined-github or qutebrowser?

Choose refined-github if you want the larger community (32,187 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qutebrowser if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.