head to head · open source

refined-github vs archiveweb.page

refined-github has 32,432 GitHub stars, 1,935 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. archiveweb.page has 1,616 stars, 116 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. refined-github leads on adoption by 1,907% (32,432 vs 1,616 stars). refined-github is written in TypeScript under MIT; archiveweb.page is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. refined-github has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, archiveweb.page 7%. refined-github was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

refined-github ★ 32K archiveweb.page ★ 1.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

refined-github archiveweb.page
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 1.6K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 116
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick refined-github if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full refined-github profile →

pick archiveweb.page if

  • You want the archiveweb.page feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and archiveweb.page fits your workflow better

full archiveweb.page profile →

About refined-github

Refined GitHub Browser extension that simplifies the GitHub interface and adds useful features We use GitHub a lot and notice many annoyances we'd like to fix. So here be dragons. Our hope is that GitHub will notice and implement some of these much needed improvements. So if you like any of these improvements, please open a discussion on GitHub feedback or contact GitHub support about doing it. GitHub Enterprise is also supported: How to enable it. The GITHUB and REFINED GITHUB trademarks are owned by GitHub, Inc. and used under license. Install [link chrome]: 'Version published on Chrome Web Store' [link…

read the full refined-github overview →

About archiveweb.page

ArchiveWeb.page is a JavaScript based application for interactive, high fidelity web archiving that runs directly in the browser. The system can be used as a Chrome/Chromium based browser extension and also as a standalone Electron app. The system creates, stores, and replays high fidelity web archives stored directly in the browser's storage (via IndexedDB). For more detailed info on how to use the extension and standalone app, see the ArchiveWeb.page User Guide. The browser extension is available on the Chrome Web Store. Downloads for the desktop are are available on the GitHub Releases page. Architecture The…

read the full archiveweb.page overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is refined-github or archiveweb.page more popular?

refined-github has 32,432 GitHub stars and archiveweb.page has 1,616. refined-github has the larger community by that measure.

Are refined-github and archiveweb.page free?

Both are open source. refined-github is licensed under MIT and archiveweb.page under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between refined-github and archiveweb.page?

refined-github is written in TypeScript and archiveweb.page in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, refined-github or archiveweb.page?

Choose refined-github if you want the larger community (32,432 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose archiveweb.page if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.