head to head · open source

Redash vs kepler.gl

Redash has 28,802 GitHub stars, 4,624 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. kepler.gl has 12,017 stars, 1,959 forks, 452 open issues and last shipped today. Redash leads on adoption by 140% (28,802 vs 12,017 stars). Redash is written in Python under BSD-2-Clause; kepler.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT. Redash has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, kepler.gl 16%. kepler.gl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Redash ★ 29K kepler.gl ★ 12K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Redash kepler.gl
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 12K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-03 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 2.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Redash if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Redash profile →

pick kepler.gl if

  • You want the kepler.gl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and kepler.gl fits your workflow better

full kepler.gl profile →

About Redash

Redash is an open source business intelligence and data analytics platform built with Python and JavaScript. It enables users to connect to diverse data sources, write and execute SQL/NoSQL queries, build visualizations, and share interactive dashboards—all through a browser based interface.

read the full Redash overview →

About kepler.gl

Kepler.gl is an MIT licensed, TypeScript geospatial analysis tool that renders large scale geolocation data sets in the browser at million point scale, built for data analysts, GIS practitioners, and React developers who need to explore trip and point data without assembling their own rendering stack.

read the full kepler.gl overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Redash vs Mermaid Redash vs Apache Superset Redash vs echarts Redash vs Metabase Redash vs pixijs Redash vs diagram-design Redash vs dataease Redash vs dash Redash vs plotly.js Redash vs deck.gl Redash vs G6 Redash vs sigma.js

Frequently asked questions

Is Redash or kepler.gl more popular?

Redash has 28,802 GitHub stars and kepler.gl has 12,017. Redash has the larger community by that measure.

Are Redash and kepler.gl free?

Both are open source. Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and kepler.gl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Redash and kepler.gl?

Redash is written in Python and kepler.gl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Redash or kepler.gl?

Choose Redash if you want the larger community (28,802 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose kepler.gl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.