head to head · open source
Redash vs deck.gl
Redash has 28,860 GitHub stars, 4,634 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. deck.gl has 14,728 stars, 2,297 forks, 532 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Redash leads on adoption by 96% (28,860 vs 14,728 stars). Redash is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; deck.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT. Redash has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, deck.gl 16%. Redash was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Redash | deck.gl | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 15K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.6K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Redash if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick deck.gl if
- You want the deck.gl feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and deck.gl fits your workflow better
About Redash
Redash is designed to enable anyone, regardless of the level of technical sophistication, to harness the power of data big and small. SQL users leverage Redash to explore, query, visualize, and share data from any data source. Their work, in turn, enables anybody in their organization to use the data. Every day, millions of users at thousands of organizations around the world use Redash to develop insights and make data driven decisions. Redash features: 1. Browser based : Everything in your browser, with a shareable URL. 2. Ease of use : Become immediately productive with data without the need to master complex…
read the full Redash overview →
About deck.gl
deck.gl Website GPU powered, highly performant large scale data visualization deck.gl is designed to simplify high performance, WebGL2/WebGPU based visualization of large data sets. Users can quickly get impressive visual results with minimal effort by composing existing layers, or leverage deck.gl's extensible architecture to address custom needs. deck.gl maps data (usually an array of JSON objects) into a stack of visual layers e.g. icons, polygons, texts; and look at them with views : e.g. map, first person, orthographic. deck.gl handles a number of challenges out of the box: Performant rendering and updating…
read the full deck.gl overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Redash or deck.gl more popular?
Redash has 28,860 GitHub stars and deck.gl has 14,728. Redash has the larger community by that measure.
Are Redash and deck.gl free?
Both are open source. Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and deck.gl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Redash and deck.gl?
Redash is written in TypeScript and deck.gl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Redash or deck.gl?
Choose Redash if you want the larger community (28,860 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose deck.gl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.