head to head · open source

Redash vs deck.gl

Redash has 28,800 GitHub stars, 4,624 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. deck.gl has 14,597 stars, 2,267 forks, 532 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Redash leads on adoption by 97% (28,800 vs 14,597 stars). Redash is written in Python under BSD-2-Clause; deck.gl is written in TypeScript under MIT. Redash has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, deck.gl 16%. deck.gl was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Redash ★ 29K deck.gl ★ 15K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Redash deck.gl
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 15K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-03 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 2.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Redash if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Redash profile →

pick deck.gl if

  • You want the deck.gl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and deck.gl fits your workflow better

full deck.gl profile →

About Redash

Redash is an open source business intelligence and data analytics platform built with Python and JavaScript. It enables users to connect to diverse data sources, write and execute SQL/NoSQL queries, build visualizations, and share interactive dashboards—all through a browser based interface.

read the full Redash overview →

About deck.gl

deck.gl is an MIT licensed, WebGL2 and WebGPU powered visualization framework that renders large scale geospatial and data driven layers in the browser, built for JavaScript, TypeScript and Python developers who need high performance maps and custom visualizations without writing their own GPU rendering code.

read the full deck.gl overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.

Redash vs Mermaid Redash vs Apache Superset Redash vs echarts Redash vs Metabase Redash vs pixijs Redash vs diagram-design Redash vs dataease Redash vs dash Redash vs plotly.js Redash vs G6 Redash vs sigma.js Redash vs Evidence

Frequently asked questions

Is Redash or deck.gl more popular?

Redash has 28,800 GitHub stars and deck.gl has 14,597. Redash has the larger community by that measure.

Are Redash and deck.gl free?

Both are open source. Redash is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and deck.gl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Redash and deck.gl?

Redash is written in Python and deck.gl in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Redash or deck.gl?

Choose Redash if you want the larger community (28,800 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose deck.gl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.