head to head · open source

vuls vs Raccoon

vuls has 12,264 GitHub stars, 1,243 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Raccoon has 4,027 stars, 501 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. vuls leads on adoption by 205% (12,264 vs 4,027 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Raccoon is written in Python under MIT. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Raccoon 12%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vuls ★ 12K Raccoon ★ 4.0K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

vuls Raccoon
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 4.0K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-04-21
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 501
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vuls if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vuls profile →

pick Raccoon if

  • You want the Raccoon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Raccoon fits your workflow better

full Raccoon profile →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

About Raccoon

Raccoon is an open source, MIT licensed offensive security tool written in Python for reconnaissance and information gathering, built for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security analysts who need to map a target's DNS, TLS, network, and web footprint from a single command line.

read the full Raccoon overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

vuls vs PayloadsAllTheThings vuls vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vuls vs ProjectDiscovery vuls vs pentagi vuls vs PentestGPT vuls vs Osintgram vuls vs osv-scanner vuls vs Nettacker vuls vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool vuls vs afrog vuls vs Tracecat vuls vs emba

Frequently asked questions

Is vuls or Raccoon more popular?

vuls has 12,264 GitHub stars and Raccoon has 4,027. vuls has the larger community by that measure.

Are vuls and Raccoon free?

Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Raccoon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vuls and Raccoon?

vuls is written in Go and Raccoon in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vuls or Raccoon?

Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,264 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Raccoon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.