head to head · open source

vuls vs Nettacker

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars, 1,243 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Nettacker has 5,585 stars, 1,176 forks, 249 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. vuls leads on adoption by 120% (12,263 vs 5,585 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Nettacker is written in Python under Apache-2.0. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Nettacker 21%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vuls ★ 12K Nettacker ★ 5.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

vuls Nettacker
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 5.6K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vuls if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vuls profile →

pick Nettacker if

  • You want the Nettacker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Nettacker fits your workflow better

full Nettacker profile →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

About Nettacker

OWASP Nettacker is an open source, Python based automated penetration testing and information gathering framework for cyber security professionals and ethical hackers who need to run reconnaissance, vulnerability assessment, and network security audits efficiently.

read the full Nettacker overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

vuls vs PayloadsAllTheThings vuls vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vuls vs ProjectDiscovery vuls vs pentagi vuls vs osv-scanner vuls vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool vuls vs afrog vuls vs Tracecat vuls vs airgorah vuls vs tenzir

Frequently asked questions

Is vuls or Nettacker more popular?

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars and Nettacker has 5,585. vuls has the larger community by that measure.

Are vuls and Nettacker free?

Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Nettacker under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vuls and Nettacker?

vuls is written in Go and Nettacker in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vuls or Nettacker?

Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,263 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Nettacker if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.