head to head · open source

vuls vs afrog

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars, 1,243 forks, 92 open issues and last shipped yesterday. afrog has 4,417 stars, 484 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vuls leads on adoption by 178% (12,263 vs 4,417 stars). vuls is written in Go under GPL-3.0; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. vuls has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. vuls was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vuls ★ 12K afrog ★ 4.4K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

vuls afrog
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 4.4K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 484
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vuls if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vuls profile →

pick afrog if

  • You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better

full afrog profile →

About vuls

Vuls is an agent less vulnerability scanner written in Go and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at system administrators and security teams that must find and track known vulnerabilities across Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and macOS hosts, containers, WordPress installs, programming language libraries and network devices without installing an agent on every machine.

read the full vuls overview →

About afrog

afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.

read the full afrog overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

vuls vs PayloadsAllTheThings vuls vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills vuls vs ProjectDiscovery vuls vs pentagi vuls vs osv-scanner vuls vs Nettacker vuls vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool vuls vs Tracecat vuls vs airgorah vuls vs tenzir

Frequently asked questions

Is vuls or afrog more popular?

vuls has 12,263 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,417. vuls has the larger community by that measure.

Are vuls and afrog free?

Both are open source. vuls is licensed under GPL-3.0 and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vuls and afrog?

vuls is written in Go and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vuls or afrog?

Choose vuls if you want the larger community (12,263 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.