head to head · open source
fingerprintjs vs qutebrowser
fingerprintjs has 28,487 GitHub stars, 2,623 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. qutebrowser has 11,699 stars, 1,130 forks, 1,335 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. fingerprintjs leads on adoption by 143% (28,487 vs 11,699 stars). fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript under MIT; qutebrowser is written in Python under GPL-3.0. fingerprintjs has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, qutebrowser 10%. fingerprintjs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| fingerprintjs | qutebrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 28K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick fingerprintjs if
- You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick qutebrowser if
- You want the qutebrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and qutebrowser fits your workflow better
About fingerprintjs
FingerprintJS is an open source, client side browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them, aimed at web developers and engineering teams that need to recognise returning browsers without depending on cookies or local storage.
read the full fingerprintjs overview →
About qutebrowser
qutebrowser is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed, keyboard driven browser with a minimal GUI, built on Python and Qt, for people who want vim style keyboard control of the web rather than a mouse.
read the full qutebrowser overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is fingerprintjs or qutebrowser more popular?
fingerprintjs has 28,487 GitHub stars and qutebrowser has 11,699. fingerprintjs has the larger community by that measure.
Are fingerprintjs and qutebrowser free?
Both are open source. fingerprintjs is licensed under MIT and qutebrowser under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between fingerprintjs and qutebrowser?
fingerprintjs is written in TypeScript and qutebrowser in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, fingerprintjs or qutebrowser?
Choose fingerprintjs if you want the larger community (28,487 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose qutebrowser if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.