head to head · open source

qinglong vs Donetick

qinglong has 19,887 GitHub stars, 3,232 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Donetick has 2,562 stars, 199 forks, 176 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. qinglong leads on adoption by 676% (19,887 vs 2,562 stars). qinglong is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Donetick is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Donetick 8%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, task-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

qinglong ★ 20K Donetick ★ 2.6K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

qinglong Donetick
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 2.6K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-19
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 199
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick qinglong if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full qinglong profile →

pick Donetick if

  • You want the Donetick feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Donetick fits your workflow better

full Donetick profile →

About qinglong

Qinglong is a self hosted timed task management platform that schedules and runs Python 3, JavaScript, Shell, and TypeScript scripts from a web interface, built for developers and operators who want central control over scheduled jobs instead of hand editing crontab on every machine.

read the full qinglong overview →

About Donetick

Donetick is an open source task and chore management app built in Go with a React frontend, released under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the self hosted productivity ecosystem and targets individuals, families, and groups that need shared lists with scheduling, assignment, and progress tracking.

read the full Donetick overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs qinglong wekan vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev vibe-kanban vs planka vibe-kanban vs leantime plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

qinglong vs vibe-kanban qinglong vs Wekan qinglong vs edict qinglong vs OpenProject qinglong vs onedev qinglong vs Planka qinglong vs Leantime qinglong vs kanboard qinglong vs Kaneo qinglong vs ccpm qinglong vs Fizzy qinglong vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is qinglong or Donetick more popular?

qinglong has 19,887 GitHub stars and Donetick has 2,562. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.

Are qinglong and Donetick free?

Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Donetick under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between qinglong and Donetick?

qinglong is written in TypeScript and Donetick in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, qinglong or Donetick?

Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (19,887 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Donetick if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.