head to head · open source
qinglong vs edict
qinglong has 20,056 GitHub stars, 3,225 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. edict has 17,046 stars, 1,768 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. qinglong leads on adoption by 18% (20,056 vs 17,046 stars). qinglong is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0; edict is written in Python under MIT. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, edict 10%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| qinglong | edict | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 17K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-09-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick qinglong if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick edict if
- You want the edict feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and edict fits your workflow better
About qinglong
青龙 简体中文 English 支持 Python3、JavaScript、Shell、Typescript 的定时任务管理平台 Timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, Typescript [![npm version][npm version image]][npm version url] [![docker pulls][docker pulls image]][docker pulls url] [![docker stars][docker stars image]][docker stars url] [![docker image size][docker image size image]][docker image size url] [npm version image]: [npm version url]: [docker pulls image]: [docker pulls url]: [docker stars image]: [docker stars url]: [docker image size image]: [docker image size url]: Demo / Issues / Telegram Channel / Buy Me a Coffee 演示 / 反馈 /…
read the full qinglong overview →
About edict
⚔️ 三省六部 · Edict 我用 1300 年前的帝国制度，重新设计了 AI 多 Agent 协作架构。 结果发现，古人比现代 AI 框架更懂分权制衡。 12 个 AI Agent（11 个业务角色 + 1 个兼容角色）组成三省六部：太子分拣、中书省规划、门下省审核封驳、尚书省派发、六部+吏部并行执行。 比 CrewAI 多一层 制度性审核 ，比 AutoGen 多一个 实时看板 。 🎬 看 Demo · 🚀 30 秒体验 · 🏛️ 架构 · 📋 看板功能 · 📚 架构文档 · English · 日本語 · 参与贡献 🎬 Demo 您的浏览器不支持视频播放，请查看下方 GIF 或 下载视频 。 🎥 三省六部 AI 多 Agent 协作全流程演示 📸 GIF 预览（加载更快） 飞书下旨 → 太子分拣 → 中书省规划 → 门下省审议 → 六部并行执行 → 奏折回报（30 秒） 🐳 没有 OpenClaw？ 跑一行 docker run p 7891:7891 cft0808/edict 即可体验完整看板 Demo（预置模拟数据）。 🤔 为什么是三省六部？ 大多数 Multi Agent 框架的套路是： "来，你们几个 AI 自己聊，聊完把结果给我。" 然后你拿到一坨不知道经过了什么处理的结果，无法复现，无法审计，无法干预。 三省六部的思路完全不同 —— 我们用了一个在中国存在 1400…
read the full edict overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Project & Work Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is qinglong or edict more popular?
qinglong has 20,056 GitHub stars and edict has 17,046. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.
Are qinglong and edict free?
Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and edict under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between qinglong and edict?
qinglong is written in JavaScript and edict in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, qinglong or edict?
Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (20,056 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose edict if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.