head to head · open source

qinglong vs edict

qinglong has 19,887 GitHub stars, 3,232 forks, 108 open issues and last shipped yesterday. edict has 16,900 stars, 1,769 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. qinglong leads on adoption by 18% (19,887 vs 16,900 stars). qinglong is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; edict is written in Python under MIT. qinglong has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, edict 10%. qinglong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

qinglong ★ 20K edict ★ 17K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

qinglong edict
GitHub stars ★ 20K ★ 17K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick qinglong if

  • You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full qinglong profile →

pick edict if

  • You want the edict feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and edict fits your workflow better

full edict profile →

About qinglong

Qinglong is a self hosted timed task management platform that schedules and runs Python 3, JavaScript, Shell, and TypeScript scripts from a web interface, built for developers and operators who want central control over scheduled jobs instead of hand editing crontab on every machine.

read the full qinglong overview →

About edict

Edict is an MIT licensed Python orchestration system that runs multi agent LLM work through the Tang dynasty Three Departments and Six Ministries, splitting the job across eleven business roles plus one compatibility role so that planning, review, dispatch, and execution are handled by separate agents, and it is built for teams running OpenClaw that need every hand off between agents to be reviewable, auditable, and interruptible.

read the full edict overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict wekan vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev vibe-kanban vs planka vibe-kanban vs leantime plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

qinglong vs vibe-kanban qinglong vs Wekan qinglong vs OpenProject qinglong vs onedev qinglong vs Planka qinglong vs Leantime qinglong vs kanboard qinglong vs Kaneo qinglong vs ccpm qinglong vs Fizzy qinglong vs Backlog.md qinglong vs taskwarrior

Frequently asked questions

Is qinglong or edict more popular?

qinglong has 19,887 GitHub stars and edict has 16,900. qinglong has the larger community by that measure.

Are qinglong and edict free?

Both are open source. qinglong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and edict under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between qinglong and edict?

qinglong is written in TypeScript and edict in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, qinglong or edict?

Choose qinglong if you want the larger community (19,887 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose edict if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.