head to head · open source

puppeteer vs rnx-kit

puppeteer has 95,657 GitHub stars, 9,587 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rnx-kit has 1,737 stars, 119 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped today. puppeteer leads on adoption by 5,407% (95,657 vs 1,737 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; rnx-kit is written in TypeScript under MIT. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, rnx-kit 7%. rnx-kit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K rnx-kit ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer rnx-kit
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-04 2026-10-05
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 119
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick rnx-kit if

  • You want the rnx-kit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rnx-kit fits your workflow better

full rnx-kit profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About rnx-kit

rnx kit is a collection of MIT licensed TypeScript tools built by Microsoft engineers for React Native developers who need to manage dependencies, bundle code, and build mobile apps consistently across large projects.

read the full rnx-kit overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 273K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 156K pi ★ 113K

Related comparisons

ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs i-have-adhd puppeteer vs codebase-memory-mcp puppeteer vs herdr puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or rnx-kit more popular?

puppeteer has 95,657 GitHub stars and rnx-kit has 1,737. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and rnx-kit free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rnx-kit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and rnx-kit?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and rnx-kit in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or rnx-kit?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,657 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rnx-kit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.