head to head · open source

puppeteer vs Lightpanda

puppeteer has 95,591 GitHub stars, 9,579 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped today. Lightpanda has 35,452 stars, 1,684 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped today. puppeteer leads on adoption by 170% (95,591 vs 35,452 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Lightpanda 5%. puppeteer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K Lightpanda ★ 35K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer Lightpanda
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 35K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Zig
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick Lightpanda if

  • You want the Lightpanda feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Zig
  • You evaluated both and Lightpanda fits your workflow better

full Lightpanda profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About Lightpanda

Lightpanda is a headless browser built from scratch in Zig, designed specifically for AI agents and automation tasks. It is not a fork of Chromium or WebKit but a new implementation targeting performance and efficiency in automated web interactions. It lives in the browser automation ecosystem, competing with tools like Puppeteer and Playwright that typically rely on Chromium based headless modes.

read the full Lightpanda overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs i-have-adhd puppeteer vs codebase-memory-mcp puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools puppeteer vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or Lightpanda more popular?

puppeteer has 95,591 GitHub stars and Lightpanda has 35,452. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and Lightpanda free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Lightpanda under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and Lightpanda?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and Lightpanda in Zig. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or Lightpanda?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,591 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Lightpanda if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.