head to head · open source

puppeteer vs Budibase

puppeteer has 95,591 GitHub stars, 9,579 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped today. Budibase has 28,292 stars, 2,216 forks, 276 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. puppeteer leads on adoption by 238% (95,591 vs 28,292 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Budibase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Budibase 8%. puppeteer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K Budibase ★ 28K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer Budibase
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 28K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick Budibase if

  • You want the Budibase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Budibase fits your workflow better

full Budibase profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About Budibase

Budibase is an open source low code platform for building internal tools, data apps, and AI powered agents that automate operational workflows. It lives in the low code/no code ecosystem and serves as a self hostable alternative to proprietary platforms like Retool.

read the full Budibase overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs i-have-adhd puppeteer vs codebase-memory-mcp puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools puppeteer vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or Budibase more popular?

puppeteer has 95,591 GitHub stars and Budibase has 28,292. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and Budibase free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Budibase has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between puppeteer and Budibase?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and Budibase in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or Budibase?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,591 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Budibase if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.