head to head · open source
CloakBrowser vs puppeteer-sharp
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars, 2,720 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. puppeteer-sharp has 3,934 stars, 483 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. CloakBrowser leads on adoption by 732% (32,712 vs 3,934 stars). CloakBrowser is written in Python under MIT; puppeteer-sharp is written in C# under MIT. CloakBrowser has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, puppeteer-sharp 12%. CloakBrowser was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chromium), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloakBrowser | puppeteer-sharp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 3.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.7K | ⑂ 483 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloakBrowser if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick puppeteer-sharp if
- You want the puppeteer-sharp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and puppeteer-sharp fits your workflow better
About CloakBrowser
Stealth Chromium that passes every bot detection test. Not a patched config. Not a JS injection. A real Chromium binary with fingerprints modified at the C++ source level. Antibot systems score it as a normal browser — because it is a normal browser. Cloudflare Turnstile — 3 live tests passing (headed mode, macOS) Drop in Playwright/Puppeteer replacement for Python and JavaScript. Same API, same code — just swap the import. 3 lines of code, 30 seconds to unblock. 87 source level C++ patches — canvas, WebGL, audio, fonts, GPU, screen, WebRTC, network timing, automation signals, CDP input behavior humanize=True —…
read the full CloakBrowser overview →
About puppeteer-sharp
Puppeteer Sharp [ ][NugetUrl] [ ][BuildUrl] [ ][BuildDemoUrl] [ ][Backers] [NugetUrl]: [BuildUrl]: [BuildDemoUrl]: [Backers]: Puppeteer Sharp is a .NET port of the official Node.JS Puppeteer API. Recent news Test the latest Firefox versions using WebDriver BiDi! Check the PuppeteerSharp 21 release notes. PuppeteerSharp now supports AOT compilation! Check the PuppeteerSharp 19 release notes!. Useful links API Documentation Slack channel puppeteer sharp StackOverflow Issues Blog Published Packages Prerequisites Puppeteer Sharp comes in two flavors: a NetStandard 2.0 library for .NET Framework 4.6.1 and .NET Core…
read the full puppeteer-sharp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloakBrowser or puppeteer-sharp more popular?
CloakBrowser has 32,712 GitHub stars and puppeteer-sharp has 3,934. CloakBrowser has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloakBrowser and puppeteer-sharp free?
Both are open source. CloakBrowser is licensed under MIT and puppeteer-sharp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloakBrowser and puppeteer-sharp?
CloakBrowser is written in Python and puppeteer-sharp in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloakBrowser or puppeteer-sharp?
Choose CloakBrowser if you want the larger community (32,712 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose puppeteer-sharp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.