head to head · open source
ProxmoxVE vs local-deep-research
ProxmoxVE has 30,010 GitHub stars, 2,938 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. local-deep-research has 9,483 stars, 899 forks, 889 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProxmoxVE leads on adoption by 216% (30,010 vs 9,483 stars). ProxmoxVE is written in Shell under MIT; local-deep-research is written in Python under MIT. ProxmoxVE has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, local-deep-research 9%. local-deep-research was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ProxmoxVE | local-deep-research | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 9.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Shell | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 899 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ProxmoxVE if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick local-deep-research if
- You want the local-deep-research feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and local-deep-research fits your workflow better
About ProxmoxVE
Proxmox VE Helper Scripts One command installations for services, containers, and VMs on Proxmox VE A community project — built on the foundation of @tteck 's original work What is this? Simplify your Proxmox VE setup with community driven automation scripts. Install and configure popular self hosted services with a single command — no manual package hunting, no config file archaeology. Paste a command into your Proxmox shell, answer a few prompts, and your container or VM is up and running. The collection covers hundreds of services across categories like home automation, media servers, networking tools…
read the full ProxmoxVE overview →
About local-deep-research
Local Deep Research AI powered research assistant for deep, agentic research Performs deep, agentic research using multiple LLMs and search engines with proper citations 🧪 First open source project — fully local on a single RTX 3090 (Qwen3.6 27B) — to report 95% SimpleQA (n=500) and 77% xbench DeepSearch (n=100) on local hardware. See the r/LocalLLaMA announcement and the benchmark dataset. ▶️ Watch Review by The Art Of The Terminal 🚀 What is Local Deep Research? AI research assistant you control. Run locally for privacy, use any LLM and build your own searchable knowledge base. You own your data and see…
read the full local-deep-research overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ProxmoxVE or local-deep-research more popular?
ProxmoxVE has 30,010 GitHub stars and local-deep-research has 9,483. ProxmoxVE has the larger community by that measure.
Are ProxmoxVE and local-deep-research free?
Both are open source. ProxmoxVE is licensed under MIT and local-deep-research under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ProxmoxVE and local-deep-research?
ProxmoxVE is written in Shell and local-deep-research in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ProxmoxVE or local-deep-research?
Choose ProxmoxVE if you want the larger community (30,010 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose local-deep-research if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.