head to head · open source
ProxmoxVE vs f-flow
ProxmoxVE has 30,010 GitHub stars, 2,938 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. f-flow has 541 stars, 66 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. ProxmoxVE leads on adoption by 5,447% (30,010 vs 541 stars). ProxmoxVE is written in Shell under MIT; f-flow is written in TypeScript under MIT. ProxmoxVE has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, f-flow 12%. ProxmoxVE was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ProxmoxVE | f-flow | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 541 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Shell | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 66 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ProxmoxVE if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Shell
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick f-flow if
- You want the f-flow feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and f-flow fits your workflow better
About ProxmoxVE
Proxmox VE Helper Scripts One command installations for services, containers, and VMs on Proxmox VE A community project — built on the foundation of @tteck 's original work What is this? Simplify your Proxmox VE setup with community driven automation scripts. Install and configure popular self hosted services with a single command — no manual package hunting, no config file archaeology. Paste a command into your Proxmox shell, answer a few prompts, and your container or VM is up and running. The collection covers hundreds of services across categories like home automation, media servers, networking tools…
read the full ProxmoxVE overview →
About f-flow
Foblex Flow The most adopted node editor library for Angular — for production workflow builders, AI pipelines, and interactive diagram editors. Foblex Flow ships the hard parts of a production node editor — drag logic, hit testing, SVG connection paths, reassign, selection, zoom, and undo/redo — as Angular native building blocks. Begin with f flow , f canvas , nodes, and connections, then add richer editor features only when your product needs them. It powers production products such as Luware Nimbus, ProcessMIX, XpertAI, and EpicStaff. Use it to create workflow builders, AI low code tools, call flow editors…
read the full f-flow overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ProxmoxVE or f-flow more popular?
ProxmoxVE has 30,010 GitHub stars and f-flow has 541. ProxmoxVE has the larger community by that measure.
Are ProxmoxVE and f-flow free?
Both are open source. ProxmoxVE is licensed under MIT and f-flow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ProxmoxVE and f-flow?
ProxmoxVE is written in Shell and f-flow in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ProxmoxVE or f-flow?
Choose ProxmoxVE if you want the larger community (30,010 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose f-flow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.