head to head · open source

pdfcpu vs mm-wiki

pdfcpu has 8,842 GitHub stars, 633 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. mm-wiki has 3,774 stars, 849 forks, 175 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. pdfcpu leads on adoption by 134% (8,842 vs 3,774 stars). pdfcpu is written in Go under Apache-2.0; mm-wiki is written in Go under MIT. pdfcpu has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, mm-wiki 22%. pdfcpu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pdfcpu ★ 8.8K mm-wiki ★ 3.8K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

pdfcpu mm-wiki
GitHub stars ★ 8.8K ★ 3.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-04-05
Forks ⑂ 633 ⑂ 849
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pdfcpu if

  • You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pdfcpu profile →

pick mm-wiki if

  • You want the mm-wiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and mm-wiki fits your workflow better

full mm-wiki profile →

About pdfcpu

pdfcpu is a PDF processing library and command line tool written in Go. It lives in the Go and Golang ecosystem, is distributed under the Apache 2.0 license, and is listed under Business Software in the Document Management and E Signatures category. The project has existed for nine years, carries 8,835 stars and 628 forks, and lists 121 open issues. Its maintainer, Horst Rutter, is a member of the PDF Association, and the project documentation lives at pdfcpu.io. The GitHub topics attached to the repository are cli, go, golang, golang library, pdf, pdf files, and pdf tools, which describes both halves of what the…

read the full pdfcpu overview →

About mm-wiki

MM Wiki open source Go wiki. It lives in self hosted team knowledge sharing and document management ecosystem. It helps teams build enterprise Wiki and internal documentation platform. It is MIT licensed. Topics connect it to Confluence and DokuWiki. It provides spaces, documents, roles, search, attachments, Markdown editing.

read the full mm-wiki overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs pdfcpu bentopdf vs pdfcpu docuseal vs bentopdf docuseal vs documenso bentopdf vs documenso docuseal vs papermark docuseal vs opensign bentopdf vs papermark plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

pdfcpu vs Docuseal pdfcpu vs bentopdf pdfcpu vs Documenso pdfcpu vs Papermark pdfcpu vs OpenSign pdfcpu vs Papra pdfcpu vs organize pdfcpu vs community pdfcpu vs docspell pdfcpu vs PaperKnife pdfcpu vs pdfx pdfcpu vs signaturepdf

Frequently asked questions

Is pdfcpu or mm-wiki more popular?

pdfcpu has 8,842 GitHub stars and mm-wiki has 3,774. pdfcpu has the larger community by that measure.

Are pdfcpu and mm-wiki free?

Both are open source. pdfcpu is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mm-wiki under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pdfcpu and mm-wiki?

pdfcpu is written in Go and mm-wiki in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pdfcpu or mm-wiki?

Choose pdfcpu if you want the larger community (8,842 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mm-wiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.