head to head · open source

Papermark vs Wraft

Papermark has 9,181 GitHub stars, 1,396 forks, 239 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Wraft has 165 stars, 31 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Papermark leads on adoption by 5,464% (9,181 vs 165 stars). Papermark is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Wraft is written in Elixir under AGPL-3.0. Papermark has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Wraft 19%. Papermark was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (open-source), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Papermark ★ 9.2K Wraft ★ 165 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Papermark Wraft
GitHub stars ★ 9.2K ★ 165
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Elixir
Last push 2026-08-28 2026-07-04
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Papermark if

  • You weight community size — 9.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Papermark profile →

pick Wraft if

  • You want the Wraft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Elixir
  • You evaluated both and Wraft fits your workflow better

full Wraft profile →

About Papermark

Papermark open source document sharing alternative to DocSend. Project lives in Next.js/TypeScript web stack, category Business Software / Document Management & E Signatures. GitHub metadata: 9166 stars, 1392 forks, 239 open issues, last push 2026 08 28T15:58:25Z. README says built in analytics and custom domains. It is self hosted, open source, and customizable as needed. License field says NOASSERTION, so license terms need separate check.

read the full Papermark overview →

About Wraft

Wraft is an open source Document Lifecycle Management platform for teams that need to author, collaborate on, and distribute structured business documents such as official letters and contracts while keeping their content in open markdown and JSON formats.

read the full Wraft overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

docuseal vs papermark bentopdf vs papermark docuseal vs bentopdf docuseal vs documenso bentopdf vs documenso docuseal vs pdfcpu docuseal vs opensign bentopdf vs pdfcpu plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Document Management & E-Signatures projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.

Papermark vs Docuseal Papermark vs bentopdf Papermark vs Documenso Papermark vs pdfcpu Papermark vs OpenSign Papermark vs Papra Papermark vs mm-wiki Papermark vs organize Papermark vs community Papermark vs docspell Papermark vs PaperKnife Papermark vs pdfx

Frequently asked questions

Is Papermark or Wraft more popular?

Papermark has 9,181 GitHub stars and Wraft has 165. Papermark has the larger community by that measure.

Are Papermark and Wraft free?

Both are open source. Papermark has no licence declared in this registry, and Wraft is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Papermark and Wraft?

Papermark is written in TypeScript and Wraft in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Papermark or Wraft?

Choose Papermark if you want the larger community (9,181 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Wraft if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.