head to head · open source
Papermark vs mm-wiki
Papermark has 9,286 GitHub stars, 1,415 forks, 239 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. mm-wiki has 3,781 stars, 848 forks, 175 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Papermark leads on adoption by 146% (9,286 vs 3,781 stars). Papermark is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; mm-wiki is written in Go under MIT. Papermark has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, mm-wiki 22%. Papermark was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Papermark | mm-wiki | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.3K | ★ 3.8K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-08-28 | 2026-04-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 848 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Papermark if
- You weight community size — 9.3K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mm-wiki if
- You want the mm-wiki feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and mm-wiki fits your workflow better
About Papermark
Papermark The open source DocSend alternative. papermark.com Papermark is the open source document sharing alternative to DocSend, featuring built in analytics and custom domains. Features Shareable Links: Share your documents securely by sending a custom link. Custom Branding: Add a custom domain and your own branding. Analytics: Gain insights through document tracking and soon page by page analytics. Self hosted, Open source: Host it yourself and customize it as needed. Demo Tech Stack Next.js – Framework TypeScript – Language Tailwind – CSS shadcn/ui UI Components Prisma ORM PostgreSQL Database NextAuth.js –…
read the full Papermark overview →
About mm-wiki
首先非常感谢大家的使用，每次看到大家的留言，感到很惭愧，最近几年没有太多精力维护，另外当初在新功能迭代的时候发现 UI 和技术栈都需要彻底的重构，所以就保持在了当前版本未继续更新。后续我决定开始计划全新版本的开发，也希望大家共同参与起来。我在5年前做这个 wiki 的初衷也是期望成为国内免费开源的最好用的wiki系统，期望可以做成和 confluence 一样伟大的产品吧。 MM Wiki 是一个轻量级的企业知识分享与团队协同软件，可用于快速构建企业 Wiki 和团队知识分享平台。部署方便，使用简单，帮助团队构建一个信息共享、文档管理的协作环境。 特点 部署方便，基于 golang 编写，只需要下载对于平台下二进制文件执行即可。 快速安装程序, 提供方便的安装界面程序，无需任何手动操作。 独立的空间，空间是一组文档的集合，一般为公司部门或者团队，空间下的文档相互独立。空间可根据需求设置空间访问级别。 支持 markdown 语法写作，支持附件上传。 完善的系统权限管理，系统可以自定义角色，并为不同角色授予不同的权限。 集成统一登录，本系统支持通过外部系统认证用户, 比如与公司的 LDAP 登录融合。具体请看登录认证功能。 邮件通知功能，当开启邮件通知，文档更改会通知所有关注该文档的用户。 文档具有分享和下载功能，目前只支持下载 MarkDown 源文件。 支持文档全文搜索 在线快速了解 mm…
read the full mm-wiki overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Document Management & E-Signatures projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Document Management & E-Signatures field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Papermark or mm-wiki more popular?
Papermark has 9,286 GitHub stars and mm-wiki has 3,781. Papermark has the larger community by that measure.
Are Papermark and mm-wiki free?
Both are open source. Papermark has no licence declared in this registry, and mm-wiki is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Papermark and mm-wiki?
Papermark is written in TypeScript and mm-wiki in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Papermark or mm-wiki?
Choose Papermark if you want the larger community (9,286 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose mm-wiki if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.