head to head · open source
page-agent vs x-reader
page-agent has 29,619 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. x-reader has 988 stars, 97 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. page-agent leads on adoption by 2,898% (29,619 vs 988 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; x-reader is written in Python under MIT. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, x-reader 10%. page-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| page-agent | x-reader | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 988 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 97 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick page-agent if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick x-reader if
- You want the x-reader feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and x-reader fits your workflow better
About page-agent
Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…
read the full page-agent overview →
About x-reader
x reader Universal content reader — fetch, transcribe, and digest content from any platform. Give it a URL (article, video, podcast, tweet), get back structured content. Works as CLI, Python library, MCP server, or Claude Code skills. 简体中文： README.zh.md / README.zh CN.md What It Does The Python layer handles text fetching and YouTube subtitle extraction. The Claude Code skills (optional) add full Whisper transcription for video/podcast and AI powered content analysis. Three Layers x reader is composable. Use the layers you need: Layer 1: Python CLI Layer 2: Claude Code Skills Requires cloning the repo (not…
read the full x-reader overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is page-agent or x-reader more popular?
page-agent has 29,619 GitHub stars and x-reader has 988. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are page-agent and x-reader free?
Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and x-reader under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between page-agent and x-reader?
page-agent is written in TypeScript and x-reader in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, page-agent or x-reader?
Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,619 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose x-reader if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.