head to head · open source
page-agent vs workflow-use
page-agent has 29,175 GitHub stars, 2,620 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. workflow-use has 4,184 stars, 353 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. page-agent leads on adoption by 597% (29,175 vs 4,184 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; workflow-use is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, workflow-use 8%. page-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| page-agent | workflow-use | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 29K | ★ 4.2K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 353 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick page-agent if
- You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick workflow-use if
- You want the workflow-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and workflow-use fits your workflow better
About page-agent
Page Agent is an MIT licensed TypeScript library from Alibaba that embeds a natural language GUI agent directly inside a web page, aimed at product teams, accessibility engineers, and automation developers who want to drive their own interfaces with plain language instructions instead of hand written scripts.
read the full page-agent overview →
About workflow-use
Workflow Use is a Python, AGPL 3.0 licensed tool for creating and executing deterministic browser workflows — captured by demonstration or generated from a natural language prompt — that fall back to Browser Use whenever a recorded step fails, and it is aimed at developers and automation teams that need repeatable web tasks rather than one off AI agent runs.
read the full workflow-use overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is page-agent or workflow-use more popular?
page-agent has 29,175 GitHub stars and workflow-use has 4,184. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are page-agent and workflow-use free?
Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and workflow-use under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between page-agent and workflow-use?
page-agent is written in TypeScript and workflow-use in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, page-agent or workflow-use?
Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,175 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose workflow-use if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.