head to head · open source
page-agent vs wa-js
page-agent has 29,619 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wa-js has 832 stars, 252 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. page-agent leads on adoption by 3,460% (29,619 vs 832 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; wa-js is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, wa-js 30%. page-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-automation, javascript, typescript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| page-agent | wa-js | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 832 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 252 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick page-agent if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wa-js if
- You want the wa-js feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and wa-js fits your workflow better
About page-agent
Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…
read the full page-agent overview →
About wa-js
English Português (Brasil) WPPConnect/WA JS Expose WhatsApp Web functions through the browser side WPP API. A project in the WPPConnect ecosystem, maintained by WPPConnect Team. Getting started Documentation Contributing Support WPPConnect Overview For extension and browser integration developers who need to execute code inside WhatsApp Web. The generated dist/wppconnect wa.js bundle exposes chat, contact, connection and other modules; it is not a Node.js WhatsApp client. Features Chat and media operations, groups, communities, channels and business catalog functions. Connection events, profile/privacy settings…
read the full wa-js overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is page-agent or wa-js more popular?
page-agent has 29,619 GitHub stars and wa-js has 832. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are page-agent and wa-js free?
Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and wa-js under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between page-agent and wa-js?
page-agent is written in TypeScript and wa-js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, page-agent or wa-js?
Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,619 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wa-js if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.