head to head · open source

page-agent vs SeleniumBase

page-agent has 29,627 GitHub stars, 2,643 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SeleniumBase has 13,222 stars, 1,612 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. page-agent leads on adoption by 124% (29,627 vs 13,222 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; SeleniumBase is written in Python under MIT. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, SeleniumBase 12%. SeleniumBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

page-agent ★ 30K SeleniumBase ★ 13K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

page-agent SeleniumBase
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick page-agent if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full page-agent profile →

pick SeleniumBase if

  • You want the SeleniumBase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and SeleniumBase fits your workflow better

full SeleniumBase profile →

About page-agent

Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…

read the full page-agent overview →

About SeleniumBase

All in one Browser Automation Framework: Web Crawling / Testing / Scraping / Stealth 🚀 Start 🏰 Features 🎛️ Options 📚 Examples 💻 Scripts 🗾 Locale 📗 API 📘 Stealth API 🔠 DesignPatterns 🔴 Recorder 📊 Dashboard 🎖️ GUI 📰 TestPage 👤 UC Mode 🐙 CDP Mode 📶 Charts 🖥️ Farm 👁️ How 🚝 Migration 🎭 Stealthy Playwright 🛂 MasterQA 🚎 Tours 🤖 MCP 🟨 JS Mgr 🌏 Translator 🎞️ Presenter 🖼️ Visual 🗂️ CPlans 🐙 CDP Mode bypasses bot detection with Chromium based browsers. 🎭 Stealthy Playwright Mode extends CDP Mode's stealth to Playwright. pip install seleniumbase for the main framework. (Or use uv add ) pip…

read the full SeleniumBase overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is page-agent or SeleniumBase more popular?

page-agent has 29,627 GitHub stars and SeleniumBase has 13,222. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are page-agent and SeleniumBase free?

Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and SeleniumBase under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between page-agent and SeleniumBase?

page-agent is written in TypeScript and SeleniumBase in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, page-agent or SeleniumBase?

Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,627 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SeleniumBase if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.