head to head · open source
page-agent vs mcp
page-agent has 29,683 GitHub stars, 2,641 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mcp has 7,355 stars, 606 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. page-agent leads on adoption by 304% (29,683 vs 7,355 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; mcp is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mcp 8%. page-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| page-agent | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 30K | ★ 7.4K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-13 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.6K | ⑂ 606 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick page-agent if
- You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick mcp if
- You want the mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and mcp fits your workflow better
About page-agent
Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…
read the full page-agent overview →
About mcp
Browser MCP Browser MCP lets AI apps (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Codex, Claude Desktop…) use your own Chrome: your signed in sites, your profile, in tabs of their own. Everything runs on your computer. Website and docs : browsermcp.io, docs Extension : Chrome Web Store, or build it yourself MCP server : @browsermcp/mcp on npm How it works Each AI app runs the MCP server ( npx @browsermcp/mcp@latest ), a small process that starts one daemon per user and forwards the app's browser tool calls to it. The daemon drives the browser's tabs with Playwright, through the extension: a thin chrome.debugger relay that…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is page-agent or mcp more popular?
page-agent has 29,683 GitHub stars and mcp has 7,355. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.
Are page-agent and mcp free?
Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and mcp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between page-agent and mcp?
page-agent is written in TypeScript and mcp in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, page-agent or mcp?
Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,683 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mcp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.