head to head · open source

page-agent vs lcu

page-agent has 29,351 GitHub stars, 2,640 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. lcu has 735 stars, 34 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. page-agent leads on adoption by 3,893% (29,351 vs 735 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; lcu is written in Python under MIT. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lcu 5%. lcu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-automation, mcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

page-agent ★ 29K lcu ★ 735 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

page-agent lcu
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 735
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick page-agent if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full page-agent profile →

pick lcu if

  • You want the lcu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and lcu fits your workflow better

full lcu profile →

About page-agent

Page Agent is an MIT licensed TypeScript library from Alibaba that embeds a natural language GUI agent directly inside a web page, aimed at product teams, accessibility engineers, and automation developers who want to drive their own interfaces with plain language instructions instead of hand written scripts.

read the full page-agent overview →

About lcu

LCU is a Python tool that exposes Codex's computer use runtime to any agent harness — Claude Code, Codex CLI, Pi, and others — for people who want desktop and browser control without running the Codex app's own agent.

read the full lcu overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 117K Mermaid ★ 91K Scrapling ★ 86K Crawl4AI ★ 85K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

page-agent vs Browser Use page-agent vs Scrapling page-agent vs Crawl4AI page-agent vs scrapy page-agent vs EasySpider page-agent vs Lightpanda page-agent vs changedetection.io page-agent vs CloakBrowser page-agent vs dots page-agent vs lux page-agent vs Scrapegraph-ai page-agent vs ArchiveBox

Frequently asked questions

Is page-agent or lcu more popular?

page-agent has 29,351 GitHub stars and lcu has 735. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are page-agent and lcu free?

Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and lcu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between page-agent and lcu?

page-agent is written in TypeScript and lcu in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, page-agent or lcu?

Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,351 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lcu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.