head to head · open source

paca vs itsaplan

paca has 1,836 GitHub stars, 154 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. itsaplan has 770 stars, 117 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped yesterday. paca leads on adoption by 138% (1,836 vs 770 stars). paca is written in Go under Apache-2.0; itsaplan is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. paca has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, itsaplan 15%. itsaplan was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (jira-alternative), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

paca ★ 1.8K itsaplan ★ 770 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

paca itsaplan
GitHub stars ★ 1.8K ★ 770
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 154 ⑂ 117
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick paca if

  • You weight community size — 1.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full paca profile →

pick itsaplan if

  • You want the itsaplan feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and itsaplan fits your workflow better

full itsaplan profile →

About paca

Paca is a free, open source, self hosted, AI native project management platform in which human Scrum teams and AI agents work as equal teammates on the same board, the same sprints, and the same goals.

read the full paca overview →

About itsaplan

It's a Plan (itsaplan) is an open source, self hosted project management and issue tracking application written in TypeScript under the AGPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that want Linear style planning on their own servers and for teams that want AI agents working alongside people on the same board.

read the full itsaplan overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

paca vs vibe-kanban paca vs Wekan paca vs qinglong paca vs edict paca vs OpenProject paca vs onedev paca vs Planka paca vs Leantime paca vs kanboard paca vs Kaneo paca vs ccpm paca vs Fizzy

Frequently asked questions

Is paca or itsaplan more popular?

paca has 1,836 GitHub stars and itsaplan has 770. paca has the larger community by that measure.

Are paca and itsaplan free?

Both are open source. paca is licensed under Apache-2.0 and itsaplan under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between paca and itsaplan?

paca is written in Go and itsaplan in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, paca or itsaplan?

Choose paca if you want the larger community (1,836 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose itsaplan if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.