head to head · open source

caveman vs OpenHands

caveman has 108,615 GitHub stars, 6,296 forks, 155 open issues and last shipped today. OpenHands has 89,669 stars, 11,838 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped today. caveman leads on adoption by 21% (108,615 vs 89,669 stars). caveman is written in Go under Apache-2.0; OpenHands is written in TypeScript under MIT. caveman has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, OpenHands 13%. OpenHands was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caveman ★ 109K OpenHands ★ 90K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caveman OpenHands
GitHub stars ★ 109K ★ 90K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-01 2026-10-01
Forks ⑂ 6.3K ⑂ 12K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caveman if

  • You weight community size — 109K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caveman profile →

pick OpenHands if

  • You want the OpenHands feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and OpenHands fits your workflow better

full OpenHands profile →

About caveman

why use many token when few do trick Your AI coding agent bills by the word and writes like it knows that. Caveman make it stop. ▶️ ThePrimeagen reacts: "No way this actually works" 🏆 1 on GitHub Trending · July 2026 · 🥇 1 Repository of the Day on Trendshift · April 2026 1 on Hacker News · 904 points · 366 comments · 8 Product of the Day on Product Hunt 📄 Cited in CAVEWOMAN , an Adobe Research paper that measured caveman style output cutting cost 1.4 to 2.4×, up to 3× · 🧪 Tested by JetBrains on 86 real coding tasks: "costs you nothing measurable in quality" ⚡ One command, no account, no API key. npx skills…

read the full caveman overview →

About OpenHands

OpenHands is an open source platform that provides a self hosted control center—Agent Canvas—for managing and orchestrating autonomous AI coding agents. It lives in the developer tools and AI assisted coding ecosystem, designed to turn local or remote agents into a persistent, automated engineering team. The platform supports multiple agent backends and integrates with third party services to enable scheduled or event driven automation workflows.

read the full OpenHands overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 270K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands hermes-agent vs openhands opencode vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

caveman vs OpenCode caveman vs pi caveman vs Paperclip caveman vs Orca caveman vs rtk caveman vs codegraph caveman vs Cline caveman vs Aider caveman vs Continue caveman vs Tabby caveman vs Grok Build caveman vs T3 Code

Frequently asked questions

Is caveman or OpenHands more popular?

caveman has 108,615 GitHub stars and OpenHands has 89,669. caveman has the larger community by that measure.

Are caveman and OpenHands free?

Both are open source. caveman is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OpenHands under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caveman and OpenHands?

caveman is written in Go and OpenHands in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caveman or OpenHands?

Choose caveman if you want the larger community (108,615 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose OpenHands if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.