head to head · open source

OpenHands vs codegraph

OpenHands has 88,352 GitHub stars, 11,607 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph has 71,385 stars, 4,590 forks, 518 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. OpenHands leads on adoption by 24% (88,352 vs 71,385 stars). OpenHands is written in TypeScript under MIT; codegraph is written in C under MIT. OpenHands has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, codegraph 6%. OpenHands was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenHands ★ 88K codegraph ★ 71K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenHands codegraph
GitHub stars ★ 88K ★ 71K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 4.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenHands if

  • You weight community size — 88K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenHands profile →

pick codegraph if

  • You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better

full codegraph profile →

About OpenHands

OpenHands is an open source platform that provides a self hosted control center—Agent Canvas—for managing and orchestrating autonomous AI coding agents. It lives in the developer tools and AI assisted coding ecosystem, designed to turn local or remote agents into a persistent, automated engineering team. The platform supports multiple agent backends and integrates with third party services to enable scheduled or event driven automation workflows.

read the full OpenHands overview →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands hermes-agent vs openhands opencode vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenHands vs OpenCode OpenHands vs pi OpenHands vs Paperclip OpenHands vs rtk OpenHands vs Orca OpenHands vs Cline OpenHands vs Aider OpenHands vs Continue OpenHands vs Tabby OpenHands vs Grok Build OpenHands vs T3 Code OpenHands vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenHands or codegraph more popular?

OpenHands has 88,352 GitHub stars and codegraph has 71,385. OpenHands has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenHands and codegraph free?

Both are open source. OpenHands is licensed under MIT and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenHands and codegraph?

OpenHands is written in TypeScript and codegraph in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenHands or codegraph?

Choose OpenHands if you want the larger community (88,352 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.