head to head · open source

OpenHands vs rtk

OpenHands has 88,352 GitHub stars, 11,607 forks, 713 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rtk has 80,883 stars, 5,130 forks, 1,642 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenHands leads on adoption by 9% (88,352 vs 80,883 stars). OpenHands is written in TypeScript under MIT; rtk is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. OpenHands has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, rtk 6%. OpenHands was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (cli, developer-tools, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenHands ★ 88K rtk ★ 81K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenHands rtk
GitHub stars ★ 88K ★ 81K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 5.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenHands if

  • You weight community size — 88K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenHands profile →

pick rtk if

  • You want the rtk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and rtk fits your workflow better

full rtk profile →

About OpenHands

OpenHands is an open source platform that provides a self hosted control center—Agent Canvas—for managing and orchestrating autonomous AI coding agents. It lives in the developer tools and AI assisted coding ecosystem, designed to turn local or remote agents into a persistent, automated engineering team. The platform supports multiple agent backends and integrates with third party services to enable scheduled or event driven automation workflows.

read the full OpenHands overview →

About rtk

rtk is an Apache 2.0 Rust CLI proxy that sits between an AI coding agent and the shell, filtering and compressing command output so 60 90% fewer tokens reach the model, and it is built for developers running agentic coding tools such as Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex against real repositories.

read the full rtk overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands hermes-agent vs openhands opencode vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenHands vs OpenCode OpenHands vs pi OpenHands vs Paperclip OpenHands vs codegraph OpenHands vs Orca OpenHands vs Cline OpenHands vs Aider OpenHands vs Continue OpenHands vs Tabby OpenHands vs Grok Build OpenHands vs T3 Code OpenHands vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenHands or rtk more popular?

OpenHands has 88,352 GitHub stars and rtk has 80,883. OpenHands has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenHands and rtk free?

Both are open source. OpenHands is licensed under MIT and rtk under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenHands and rtk?

OpenHands is written in TypeScript and rtk in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenHands or rtk?

Choose OpenHands if you want the larger community (88,352 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rtk if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.