head to head · open source

openagent vs swarmvault

openagent has 5,628 GitHub stars, 657 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. swarmvault has 694 stars, 81 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. openagent leads on adoption by 711% (5,628 vs 694 stars). openagent is written in Go under Apache-2.0; swarmvault is written in TypeScript under MIT. openagent has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, swarmvault 12%. openagent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

openagent ★ 5.6K swarmvault ★ 694 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

openagent swarmvault
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 694
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-30
Forks ⑂ 657 ⑂ 81
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick openagent if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full openagent profile →

pick swarmvault if

  • You want the swarmvault feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and swarmvault fits your workflow better

full swarmvault profile →

About openagent

OpenAgent is an open source, self hostable personal AI assistant written in Go under the Apache 2.0 licence, combining large language models, a retrieval augmented knowledge base, and autonomous agent loops for individuals and teams who want their own assistant running on their own machine.

read the full openagent overview →

About swarmvault

SwarmVault is a local first, MIT licensed TypeScript toolchain that turns documents, code, transcripts, notes, and URLs into a durable markdown wiki and an on disk knowledge graph that people and AI agents can inspect, query, and reuse.

read the full swarmvault overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

openagent vs storybook openagent vs Understand-Anything openagent vs devdocs openagent vs docsify openagent vs wiki openagent vs mkdocs-material openagent vs BookStack openagent vs deepwiki-open openagent vs Docs openagent vs jsdoc openagent vs Skill_Seekers openagent vs gollum

Frequently asked questions

Is openagent or swarmvault more popular?

openagent has 5,628 GitHub stars and swarmvault has 694. openagent has the larger community by that measure.

Are openagent and swarmvault free?

Both are open source. openagent is licensed under Apache-2.0 and swarmvault under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between openagent and swarmvault?

openagent is written in Go and swarmvault in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, openagent or swarmvault?

Choose openagent if you want the larger community (5,628 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose swarmvault if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.