head to head · open source

ONLYOFFICE Docs vs Pdf_Tools

ONLYOFFICE Docs has 6,911 GitHub stars, 1,309 forks, 1,135 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Pdf_Tools has 582 stars, 38 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ONLYOFFICE Docs leads on adoption by 1,087% (6,911 vs 582 stars). ONLYOFFICE Docs is written in Shell under AGPL-3.0; Pdf_Tools is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. ONLYOFFICE Docs has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, Pdf_Tools 7%. Pdf_Tools was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ONLYOFFICE Docs ★ 6.9K Pdf_Tools ★ 582 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ONLYOFFICE Docs Pdf_Tools
GitHub stars ★ 6.9K ★ 582
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Shell Kotlin
Last push 2026-07-22 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ONLYOFFICE Docs if

  • You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ONLYOFFICE Docs profile →

pick Pdf_Tools if

  • You want the Pdf_Tools feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Pdf_Tools fits your workflow better

full Pdf_Tools profile →

About ONLYOFFICE Docs

ONLYOFFICE Docs is a free collaborative online office suite of viewers and editors for text documents, spreadsheets, presentations, forms, PDFs and diagrams, intended for teams and organisations that need real time document collaboration either inside their own infrastructure or embedded in a third party file sharing platform.

read the full ONLYOFFICE Docs overview →

About Pdf_Tools

PDF Toolkit is an open source, privacy first PDF editor for Android, written in Kotlin and aimed at anyone who needs to merge, split, compress, convert, annotate, or sign PDF documents entirely on the device, with no internet connection and no account.

read the full Pdf_Tools overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs onlyoffice-docs cryptpad vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online cryptpad vs libreoffice cryptpad vs ironcalc openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Office Suites projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Office Suites field.

ONLYOFFICE Docs vs CryptPad ONLYOFFICE Docs vs gspread ONLYOFFICE Docs vs bento ONLYOFFICE Docs vs LibreOffice ONLYOFFICE Docs vs IronCalc ONLYOFFICE Docs vs KillerPDF ONLYOFFICE Docs vs Collabora Online ONLYOFFICE Docs vs yft-design ONLYOFFICE Docs vs PDF4QT ONLYOFFICE Docs vs ZenConverter

Frequently asked questions

Is ONLYOFFICE Docs or Pdf_Tools more popular?

ONLYOFFICE Docs has 6,911 GitHub stars and Pdf_Tools has 582. ONLYOFFICE Docs has the larger community by that measure.

Are ONLYOFFICE Docs and Pdf_Tools free?

Both are open source. ONLYOFFICE Docs is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pdf_Tools under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ONLYOFFICE Docs and Pdf_Tools?

ONLYOFFICE Docs is written in Shell and Pdf_Tools in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ONLYOFFICE Docs or Pdf_Tools?

Choose ONLYOFFICE Docs if you want the larger community (6,911 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Pdf_Tools if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.