head to head · open source
one-api vs uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker
one-api has 36,940 GitHub stars, 6,867 forks, 1,036 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker has 2,914 stars, 341 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. one-api leads on adoption by 1,168% (36,940 vs 2,914 stars). one-api is written in JavaScript under MIT; uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker is written in Python under MIT. one-api has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker 12%. uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| one-api | uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-01-09 | 2026-09-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.9K | ⑂ 341 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick one-api if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker if
- You want the uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker fits your workflow better
About one-api
One API is a self hosted LLM API management and key redistribution system that exposes many model providers through the standard OpenAI API format, aimed at developers, teams and operators who want a single endpoint, a single key model and a single quota surface across providers.
read the full one-api overview →
About uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker
DEPRECATED 🚨 This Docker image is now deprecated. There's no need to use it, you can just use Uvicorn with workers . ✨ Read more about it below. Supported tags and respective Dockerfile links python3.11 , latest (Dockerfile) python3.10 , (Dockerfile) python3.11 slim (Dockerfile) python3.10 slim (Dockerfile) Deprecated tags 🚨 These tags are no longer supported or maintained, they are removed from the GitHub repository, but the last versions pushed might still be available in Docker Hub if anyone has been pulling them: python3.9 python3.9 slim python3.8 python3.8 slim python3.7 python3.9 alpine3.14 python3.8 alpi…
read the full uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is one-api or uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker more popular?
one-api has 36,940 GitHub stars and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker has 2,914. one-api has the larger community by that measure.
Are one-api and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker free?
Both are open source. one-api is licensed under MIT and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between one-api and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker?
one-api is written in JavaScript and uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, one-api or uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker?
Choose one-api if you want the larger community (36,940 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose uvicorn-gunicorn-fastapi-docker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.